The classification is secure by EW, but the association is uncertain. This may be LyA with counterpart 4191 or it may be without a counterpart.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Junk. Low EW continuum feature.
Low confidence on everything. The most likely counterpart is #6044 as an [OII] emitter. There's a chance #6039 is a real counterpart and the line is LyA. Although 6039 is closer in centroid, the extent of 6044 gives it a very slightly higher chance of being the counterpart according to the calculated spatially based probability. It's also conceiveable that either of these could have contributed flux to both fibers. Mainly to be conservative, I call 6044 the most likely.
A confusing complex, but certainly low-z. There are two lines at almost exactly the same position with wavelengths that don't make sense with each other. The second line, entry 8, is very broad but appears to be real. It could almost be the hump between two absorption lines, but the wavelengths don't make sense with this item's redshift. The associations here are not certain and the photometry is very blended. I nominally call this [OII] for #6595.
See entry 7. This is low certainty on association, but is certainly low-z if even real. The line's very broad and suspicious. I nominally call this [OII] for #6596.
A nice, isolated LAE at #4369.
A clear [OII] emitter at #4639. The formal EW is above 20\AA, but that comes from a high measurement of EW compared to the other 3 because of extrapolation with error issues. The EW isn't really this high, and it should really instead come from the SED. If I do that, I get 15.14\AA restframe assuming LyA.
High confidence.
High confidence on classification, low confidence on association. 6281 is the closer and preferred counterpart, but it's a very borderline imaging detection. 6179 is more off center and also possible.
Doubtless.
Doubtless. Broad line profile suggests an AGN. No obvious CIV. No literature match. No XMM counterpart.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 18 as Hbeta, 19 as [OII]4959, and 20 as [OII]5007. 
High confidence on classification, low confidence on association. Could be either #5003 or 5004 as the counterpart. 
This is Hbeta, to be cross-listed with 16 as [OII], 19 as [OII]4959, and 20 as [OII]5007. 
This is [OII]4959, to be cross-listed with 16 as [OII], 18 as Hbeta, and 20 as [OII]5007. 
This is [OII]5007, to be cross-listed with 16 as [OII], 18 as Hbeta, and 19 as [OII]4959. 
High confidence on classification, but a funny velocity offset makes me suspicious about the counterparts. If there were two reasonable counterparts, I'd call these superimposed group members, but the only valid counterpart really is #5150. 
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 24 as [OII], 29 as Hgamma, 30 as Hbeta, and 31 as [OIII]4959. 
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 22 as [OIII]5007, 29 as Hgamma, 30 as Hbeta, and 31 as [OIII]4959. 
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
This is Hgamma to be cross-listed with 22 as [OIII]5007, 24 as [OII], 30 as Hbeta, and 31 as [OIII]4959. 
This is Hbeta to be cross-listed with 22 as [OIII]5007, 24 as [OII], 29 as Hgamma, and 31 as [OIII]4959. 
This is [OIII]4959 to be cross-listed with 22 as [OIII]5007, 24 as [OII], 29 as Hgamma, and 30 as Hbeta. 
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Medium confidence on everything. The more likely and closer option is an [OII] emitter in #5674. There's a chance this is instead an LAE with #5675.
High confidence.
Doubtless.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
High confidence.
Only low confidence that the object's real based on line profile, but if it is the counterpart is clear.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Medium uncertainty. The line might not even be real, and the spatial and spectral shapes are both funny. However, #1321 is the closest counterpart and would make this an LAE. The other possible counterpart, 1322, would also be an LAE by the EW cut.
Doubtless.
I'm not taking the nearest counterpart here as I think it's spurious and the flux pattern makes sense for #1927 instead. This changes the classification to an [OII] emitter.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. I think a satellite went through one frame and a cosmic ray another, although the usual satellite streak is not present. This is very confusing, I'll admit, but it looks like it's just a normal solar spectrum in two fibers for one exposure.
Junk. I think a satellite went through one frame and a cosmic ray another.
Doubtless.
This is a very uncertain object, although I'm giving my best guess at [OII] from 7505. The high-z SED is disfavored mainly by the z band. The object also looks suspiciously extended. However, it would make the usual EW cut, but just barely. It also depends on which bands we use for the interpolation or if we use the SED for the EW, in which is always dances around the cut. 
Doubtless.
Doubtless on classification, high confidence on association. The counterpart 7820 is most likely, although other limit straddling imaging detections are also possible that would all be LAEs too.
Junk. Broad, low EW continuum structure.