There is no z-spec in the literature. There's a near photo-z to our preferred HST clump. New LAE.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1382.
Junk.
Junk.
Junk.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1201. We picked it out cleanly from a close object.
This [OII] is AB1321 and AB1337 at nearly the same z. We picked out AB1337 as the counterpart and identified 1321 as also probable. There's a third nearby object at a different z that we correctly avoided.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1272. 
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1609.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1582.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1331. The astrometry error was very large, but our model still picked the right object out.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1378.
Junk.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1136. AB1145 is at the same redshift and near.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1353.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1242. We successfully chose away from the nearby source AB120 which is apparently as star.
This LyA is successfully matched to AB1238.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1249.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1442.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1406.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1099.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1172.
No match. Borderline object by EW, which we nominally have called [OII]. Turns out this is an LBG that failed to make a redshift in the literature. If I used the SED for classification I would have known this. New LAE.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1189.
Confusing object, and there's not help from the literature. We nominally called it [OII].
This LyA matches Lowenthal '97. Not in Barger.
Easy [OII] match to AB2040.
Same z as 27.
Easy [OII] match to AB2094.
Easy LyA match to AB1866.
Easy LyA match to AB1819.
Same line as 31.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1936.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1632.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1826.
This is [OIII]5007 successfully matched to TKRS. Not in AB oddly.
Same as line 36.
Same as line 36.
Same as line 36.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1681.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1726.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1801.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1661.
This is a new LyA redshift. Both Cowie and TKRS didn't put a slit here.
This is a new LyA redshift. It's mildly blending in the ground imaging.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB2010.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB2033.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1728.
Same as line 48.
Same as line 48.
Same as line 48.
Same as line 48.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1934.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1946.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB2016. We picked it out from a close alternative.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB2041.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1920.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1828. We picked it out from a close alternative.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1800.
Junk.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0790.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0668. AB0685 is at the same z and near.
This LAE is new. It's somewhat blended with a bright galaxy.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0773.
Same as line 64.
Same as line 64.
Same as line 64.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0883.
Same as line 68.
Same as line 68.
Same as line 68.
Same as line 68.
Junk.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1061.
Same as line 74.
Same as line 74.
Junk.
Same as line 74.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0757.
Same as line 79.
Same as line 68.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1103.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0626.
This is a new LAE. Strangely, it's not even in literature imaging catalogs. It's probably even an LBG and not terribly blended.
Same as line 74.
Junk.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0555.
Junk.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0509.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0453.
There is no literature z here, but there is an x-ray. I'm not certain of the line, but it has a GALEX NUV detection implying it's not LyA. It might be MgII or something else. However, the foreground object might be unrelated. New LAE.
No match. This is possibly a dim and ratty new LAE.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0325.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0533.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0447.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0355.
This LAE is successfully matched to AB0380.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0364.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0434. There's another near option we successfully chose against.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0511.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0354.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0487.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0474.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0605.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0441.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0323.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0378.
Same line as 106.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0531.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0393.
Junk.
Junk.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1634.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1581.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1836.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1503.
This [OIII]5007 is successfully matched to AB1414.
This LAE is successfully matched to AB0826.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0911. There's an HST blended object that's at the same z.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0735.
New [OII] object. This is blended in position with line 118.
This LAE is successfully matched to AB1067.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0720.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0811.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0701.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1073.
New LAE. Dimmer than an LBG and in a messy imaging area.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1727.
Junk.
Junk.
New LAE. Bright enough to be an LBG, but nearly blended with another galaxy. Not even separated in literature image catalogs.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1261.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1311.
New LAE. The image detection never even gets in the literature, although it's R=25.2.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1424.
This LAE/AGN is sucessfully matched at AB1226.
This Hbeta is successfully matched to AB1281.
Same as line 136.
Same as line 136.
Same as line 136.
Same as line 136.
Junk.
This [OII] is successully matched to AB1562.
Same as line 142.
This LAE is matched to AB1139.
This LAE is matched to AB1349.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1126.
This LAE is matched to AB1413.
Same as line 136.
LAE. Borderline to LBG mag cut. In the LBG sample.
We incorrectly call this [OII] when it's really [OIII]5007 for AB1222.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1335.
This LAE is matched to AB1362.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1404.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1438.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1385.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1375.
This LAE is successfully matched to AB1083.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0716.
This CIV is successfully matched to AB0845.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB1089.
This [OII] is successfully matched to AB0947.