# ID CLASVP CLAS0 COMMENTS 1 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.27: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z_phot=2.24 for HDF:[T2003] 1517. SED consistent with LAE. 4 [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.32 for [CBH2004] J189.191101+62.22393 5 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.48: NOL, Two Galaxies: Low EW for 24420 (the one the code picked) and high EW for 24417 (but line flux has contribution from both galaxies). The lines is clearly split between the two redshifts in the VP spectra. The two galaxies are in NED with z=0.4745 for TKRS 06995 and z=0.4758 for TKRS 06912. The system also shows up in NED as cluster HST J123649+62132 in Ostrander et al. 2008. # 2** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines. 3 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.32 for [CBH2004] J189.191101+62.22393 4 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.51: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.511 for HDF:[VCH2000] J123654.9+621314 6 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.47: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.47 for [MLE2007] F05. Belongs to the same cluster as detection 5. 7 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.3204 for TKRS 07972 8 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.47: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.47436 for TKRS 07992 9 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.32177 for TKRS 07255 10 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.56: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.557 for [CCH96] J123643.8+621251.2 11 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.47: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.47415 for TKRS 07557 12 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.32089 for TKRS 07206 13 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.97: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z=2.97 for HDF:[T2003] 0598 in 2003ApJ...592..728S. SED consistent with LAE 14 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.42: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.42331 for TKRS 07268 15 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.40: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.40098 for TKRS 07941 16 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.30: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.30003 for TKRS 07923 17 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Code found no counterpart. Highest probability counterpart is 28147 with p=36% and d=2.52" which gives low EW. 28147 is the right counterpart as it appears in NED with z=0.457 for HDF:[HCB98] H36448_1200 18 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.71: NOL, High EW, No counterparts in our catalog. NED shows object HDF:[T2003] 0242 with z_phot=2.72 and 0.2" away from our detection. Line profile looks ratty, and lack of counterpart made me think it might be a spurious detection, but it is real. We can't weed out objects like this just because we don't like them. 19 LAE LAE LAE@z=3.40: NOL, High EW, counterpart is a LBG in NED (2003ApJ...592..728S). Counterpart 23670 is the blend of 2 objects with 1/3 flux ration so EW is most likely underestimated by a factor of ~3 (see detection 26). SED is somewhat inconsistent with LAE, but counterpart is blended so SED i sprobably JUNK. 20 UNK UNK [OII]@z=0.33: NOL, High EW, counterpart has no redshift in NED. Counterpart we chose might be a bright star. Line (if not artifact in star's continuum) might come from background galaxy 21 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.44: NOL, High EW if is 24165. Low EW if is 24167. 24167 is in NED with z=0.441 for HDF:[VCH2000] J123645.4+621325. From VP spectra I can tell is 24167 since the SE blue fiber has significant flux. # 22* [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW. Same counterpart as detection 7 (25230) which has z=0.3204 in NED. Same lines at detection 7!!! This should not happen, look into the code. 23 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.52: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.51777 for TKRS 08089 24 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.45: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.45375 for TKRS 07111 25 LAE UNK LAE@z=3.74: NOL, High EW, counterpart not in NED. New LAE!! SED looks inconsistent but really U-band is only and upper limit, and photometry is contaminated by nearby object. 26 [OII] LAE LAE@z=3.13: NOL, Counterpart gives low EW of 15.6A but is clearly blended with the counterpart of detection 19 and the flux ratio between the two is ~1/3 so it would bearly make the EW cut. Also it looks like an LAE in the HST image. Also this detection is better centered on the porsition of the LBG (see detection 19). SED consistent with LAE. 27 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.42: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z=2.419 for HDF:[LKG97] hd2 0624 1688 # 28** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines. 29 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.47: NOL, Low EW if is 25597 (code did not picked it as counterpart because is 3.38" away). 25597 in NED with z=0.47483 for TKRS 07148. 30 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.30: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.29881 for TKRS 06960 # 31* [NeIII] [NeIII] [NeIII]@z=0.30: Same as detection 30 32 LAE LAE LAE@z=3.24: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z=3.239 for HDF:[RSE2006] BX1400 33 AGN AGN AGN(Ly-A)@z=2.21: CIV1549 detection. High EW, right counterpart in NED with z=2.211 for GOODS J123704.33+621446.6. NED also shows AGN classification. 34 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.56: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.56259 for TKRS 07364 # 35* AGN AGN CIV1549@z=2.21: Same as detection 33 36 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.51: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.51117 for TKRS 06588 37 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.56: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.56046 for TKRS 07399 # 38* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.09: Detections of [OII]3727, H-beta, and [OIII]4959. Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.08874 for TKRS 07234 39 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.09: Same as detection 38 # 40* H-beta H-beta H-beta@z=0.09: Same as detection 38 # 41* [OIII]b [OIII]b [OIII]4959@z=0.09: Same as detection 38 42 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.42: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.42263 for TKRS 07283 43 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.51: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.51168 for TKRS 07702 44 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.51: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.513 from Bauer et al. (2002AJ....123.1163B) 45 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.48: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.4748 for TKRS 07112 46 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.52: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.51461 for TKRS 07154 47 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.52: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.52382 for TKRS 07656 48 [OII] UNK [OII]@z=0.42: High EW, no redshift for counterpart in NED. New LAE!! Although there is a marginal detection of MgII if the line is [OII]3727 at z=0.42. Would an AGN at z=0.42 explain the high EW if line is OII? No X-ray counterpart in HEASARC 49 [OII] UNK LAE@z=2.80: If associated with 29111 it would be [OII]@z=0.24, Low EW, but 29111 has very secure z=0.55748 in NED (TKRS 10113). 29112 cannot explain the flux in the green fiber. There is a 3rd source in between 29111 and 29112 not in our catalog. It must be either that source or something too faint to be in the image, in which case it is most likely an LAE@z=2.80 50 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.48: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.475 for TKRS 10535 51 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.41: NOL, Low EW no matter which counterpart (29259, 29262, or 29254). 29259 has by far the highest probability (83%) but is at 3.2" from detetction. Effectively 29259 is the right counterpart in NED with z=0.41017 for TKRS 10709 52 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.14: Detections of H-gamma, H-beta, [OIII]4959, and [OIII]5007, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.1362 for TKRS 09355 # 53** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 52 # 54** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 52 # 55* H-beta H-beta H-beta@z=0.14: Same as detection 52 # 56* [OIII]b [OIII]b [OIII]4959@z=0.14: Same as detection 52 # 57* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.14: Same as detection 52 58 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.42: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.42247 for TKRS 10811 (other potential counterpart with slightly lower probability is 30794, but NED has z=1.489 for it, so the code picked the right one) 59 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.41: Spectra shows [OII]@z=0.42 comming from a NE neighbourgh (detection 58), but NOL from this object. Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.4109 for [TEL2005] 0744 60 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.48: NOL, Low EW if it is either 31265 or 31269 (both show a 50% probability). NED shows that right counterpart is 31269 with z=0.48335 for TKRS 11164 61 UNK [OII] [OII]@z=0.41: NOL, High EW if is 32109 (closest to detection) or 32108, Low EW if is 32110. NED shows right counterpart is 32110 (at a distance of 1.8" from detection) at z=0.41022 for TKRS 10855 62 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.32144 for TKRS 11004 63 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.56: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.55748 for TKRS 10113 (this was the object making detection 49 confusing) 64 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.41: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.414 for TKRS 11972 65 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.45859 for TKRS 06480 66 LAE UNK LAE@z=2.91: NOL, No counterpart in our catalog. There is a well centered faint source in the image which seems to drop in U, but is not in our catalog due to VERY bright neighbour. New LAE! 67 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.08: Detections of H-beta, [OIII]4959 and [OIII]5007, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.07883 for TKRS 06735 # 68* [OIII]b [OIII]b [OIII]4959@z=0.08: Same as detection 67 # 69* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.08: Same as detection 67 70 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.08: Detections of H-gamma, H-beta, [OIII]4959, and [OIII]5007, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.07862 for TKRS 06858 # 71** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 70 # 72* H-beta H-beta H-beta@z=0.08: Same as detection 70 # 73* [OIII]b [OIII]b [OIII]4959@z=0.08: Same as detection 70 # 74* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.08: Same as detection 70 75 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.09: Detections of H-gamma, H-beta, [OIII]4959, and [OIII]5007, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.08923 for TKRS 07570 # 76* [OIII]b [OIII]b [OIII]4959@z=0.09: Same as detection 75 # 77* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.09: Same as detection 75 # 78* H-beta H-beta H-beta@z=0.09: Same as detection 75 79 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.14: Detection of [OIII]5007, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.136 for [CBH2004] J189.135208+62.17713 # 80* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.14: Same as detection 79 81 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.53: NOL, Low EW, Two Galaxies (28408 and 28409) at the same redshift, they are in NED with z=0.52931 and z=0.52900 for TKRS 06043 and [C2001] J123629.82+621153.4 # 82* H-beta H-beta H-beta@z=0.08: Same as detection 67 # 83** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 70 # 84** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 70 # 85* H-gamma H-gamma H-gamma@z=0.08: Same as detection 70 86 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.55: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.55013 for TKRS 08617 87 LAE UNK LAE@z=2.92L NOL, High EW if is 28992 or 28993 (both have 40% probability and 28992 is very well centered) but Low EW if is 28994. Effectively, 28994 has z=1.5267 in NED so is not the counterpart. New LAE! # 88* H-gamma H-gamma H-gamma@z=0.09: Same as detection 75 # 89** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 70 90 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.23: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.23046 for TKRS 05366 # 91** JUNK JUNK Cosmic Ray fell on dither 2 and passed the masking, but is evident in detection.ps file, and in dither 2 frame vp3900pefsm.fits 92 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.28: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.27554 for TKRS 06085 93 LAE UNK LAE@z=1.98: NOL, High EW, no redshift for counterpart in NED. New LAE! 94 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.35: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.3454 for TKRS 06364 95 [OII] UNK [OII]@z=0.26: NOL, Low EW, counterpart 32155 has z_phot=0.56 in NED, but it could be wrong. 96 LAE UNK LAE@z=2.60: NOL, High EW if is 32321 (or 32464, 32320, 32319 but 32321 is by far the better centered), no redshift for counterpart in NED. Line profile looks ratty! New LAE? 97 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.25: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.25316 for TKRS 07304 98 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.29: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.28581 for TKRS 04614 99 [OII] UNK [OII]@z=0.56: NOL, Low EW, no redshift for counterpart in NED 100 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.4541 for [TEL2005] 1336 101 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.34: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.33705 for TKRS 06259 102 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.93: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z=2.93 for GOODS J123617.51+621310.0 in 2003ApJ...592..728S 103 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.44: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.4372 for TKRS 03741 104 UNK UNK [OII]@z=0.27: NOL, Low EW is is 25455 or 25466 (25466 has ame prob 38%, but is further away: 1.9" instead of 0.7"). 25455 has z=0.47325 in NED and 25466 has z=0.69442 in NED, so niether is consistent. 105 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.47: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart is 25455 in NED with z=0.47325 for TKRS 04259 106 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.40: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.39847 for TKRS 04822 107 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.45679 for TKRS 05056 108 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.56: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.55653 for TKRS 05038 109 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.40: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.3974 for TKRS 04648 110 LAE UNK LAE@z=3.07: NOL, High EW, counterpart not in NED, New LAE! 111 LAE UNK LAE@z=3.10: NOL, High EW if is 25454, no redshift for counterpart in NED. New LAE! 112 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.45798 for TKRS 04609 113 LAE UNK LAE@z=2.39: NOL, High EW, counterpart not in NED, New LAE! although line is ratty. 114 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.21: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.20686 for TKRS 02601 115 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.16: Detection os H-beta, [OIII]4959, and [OIII]5007. Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.15666 for TKRS 02952 # 116* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.16: Same as detection 115 117 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.48: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.48446 for TKRS 03943 118 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.34: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.3369 for TKRS 02476 # 119** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in star # 120** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in star 121 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.321 for HDF:[LYF96] 3-268 122 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.56: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.56224 for TKRS 08404 123 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.39: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.38673 for TKRS 09408 124 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.25: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.25418 for TKRS 09012 125 [OIII]a UNK [OIII]@z=0.09: Marginal detections of [OII]. H-beta, and [OIII]4959, Low EW, counterpart has z=0.919 in NED for HDF:[VCC2001] F36518_1125 126 LAE LAE LAE@z=3.18: NOL, High EW if is 25825 (2.8" away) or has no counterpart. 25825 is the right counterpart in NED with z=3.182 for HDF oC026 in 2003ApJ...592..728S 127 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.53: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.5281 for TKRS 05661 128 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: Another line probably coming from detection 129, Low EW, counterpart 25545 is in NED with z=0.45873 for TKRS 06215, but is a galaxy pair. I think the second galaxy is detection 129 129 [OII] UNK [OII]@z=0.48: Another line probably coming from detection 128, Low EW, counterpart 25545 is in NED with z=0.45873 for TKRS 06215, but I think this is a backgorund galaxy superimposed on 25545 130 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.59: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z=2.591 for HDF:[LYF96] 4-380 131 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.45694 for TKRS 05634 132 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.45733 for TKRS 06268 133 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.45689 for TKRS 06025 134 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.43: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.432 for HDF:[LYF96] 4-479 135 LAE UNK LAE@z=2.76: NOL, High EW if is 26519, 26530, 26538, or 26543. None of these are in NED. My best guess is that it is 26519 since it only shows up in B (where the line falls). New LAE! 136 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.41: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.408 for [CCH96] J123701.8+621323.8 # 137** JUNK JUNK Too close to a very bright star. Can;t say anything about it. # 138** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Too close to a very bright star, probably continuum blip. # 139** JUNK JUNK Too close to a very bright star. Can;t say anything about it. 140 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.53: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.5336 for TKRS 05101 # 141** JUNK JUNK Edge of masked cosmic ray on dither 1 142 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.36: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.358 for [CCH96] J123652.0+621458.3 143 LAE LAE AGN(Ly-alpha)@z=2.00: NOL, High EW, The counterpart 20782 is really two objects. The NW object is in NED with z=0.55755 for TKRS 05419. The SE object is in NED with z_phot=2.18+/-0.18 for GOODS:[WCB2004] 850-11c and is a radio source, X-ray source and shows up in SCUBA. The line is broad and consistent with the SCUBA source photo-z. 144 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.14: Detections of H-gamma, H-beta, [OIII]4959, and [OIII]5007, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.138920 for TKRS 05789 # 145** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 144 # 146** JUNK JUNK JUNK: Continuum between 2 absorption lines in detection 144 # 147* H-gamma H-gamma H-gamma@z=0.14: Same as detection 144 # 148* H-beta H-beta H-beta@z=0.14: Same as detection 144 # 149* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.14: Same as detection 144 150 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.49: NOL, High EW if is 21560 (3.4" away) or has no counterpart. 21560 has z_phot=1.84+/-0.29 in NED for HDF:[T2003] 0702, which is within 2 sigma of VP z_spec. 151 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.11: Detection of H-beta, [OIII]4959, and [OIII]5007, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.106 for [BAB2002] J123656.51+621419.9 152 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.20: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.20133 for TKRS 05625 153 LAE UNK LAE@z=3.40: NOL, High EW if is 19591 (picked by the code) or 19592 (slightly lower prob 43% vs 49% and slightly further away 2.0" vs 1.5"), counterparts don;t have redshift in NED. # 154* [OIII]b [OIII]b [OIII]4959@z=0.14: Same as detection 144 155 LAE LAE LAE@z=3.37: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z_phot=3.2 for HDF:[T2003] 0912 # 156* [OIII]a [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.11: Same as detection 151 157 [OII] [OIII]a [OIII]5007@z=0.13: NOL, Low EW, counterpart 22533 has z=0.12913 in NED for TKRS 05853 (checked TKRS spectra and it is a secure redshift), so line is really [OIII]5007 and other lines are sunk in the noise. 158 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.23: NOL, High EW if is 22765 or 22766 (which has same prob 30% but is further away 2.5" vs 2.0"). 22765 is the right counterpart in NED with z=2.237 for HDF:[FLY99] 0960 159 [OII] LAE LAE@z=3.34: NOL, Low EW , right counterpart in NED with z=3.334 for GOODS J123651.84+621516.0 from 2003ApJ...592..728S 160 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.48: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.475 for GOODS J123649.66+621113.3 from 1997ApJ...489..543P 161 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.93: NOL, High EW if is 30584 or 30583 (with slightly lower prob 34% vs 35% and futher away 2.1" vs 1.2"). 30584 is the right counterpart with z=2.928 in NED for HDF oC014 from 2003ApJ...592..728S 162 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.52: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.518 for HDF:[VCC2001] F36516_1052 163 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.32: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.32036 for TKRS 09483 164 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.41: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.40991 for TKRS 09493 165 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.47: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.47452 for TKRS 09087 166 LAE LAE LAE@z=2.96: NOL, High EW, right counterpart in NED with z=2.962 for GOODS J123642.37+621449.0 from 2003ApJ...592..728S 167 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.44: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.43824 for TKRS 04069 168 LAE AGN AGN(CIV@z=2.01): HARD ONE!!, NOL, High EW if is 21258 (most likely only 0.9" away from detection) or 21253 (which is 2.1" away), or 21257 (with same prob as 21258 but 2.1" away). Only 21257 is in NED with z=2.015 so it is CIV for this object. SED also shows is not LAE at z=2.84 169 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.53: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.5331 for TKRS 04560 170 [OII] [OII] [OII]@z=0.46: NOL, Low EW, right counterpart in NED with z=0.46196 for TKRS 04253 # # Glossary: # * means that the object has already been detected before # ** means JUNK # CLASSVP: Classification based on VP spectra and EW # CLASS0: Secure classification given by literature redshifts or LBG classification # NOL: No Other Lines # Low EW = EW_rest < 20A if line is Ly-alpha # High EW = EW_rest >= 20A if line is Ly-alpha # # # SUMMARY OF HDF-N # # 126 individual objects found # # 88/126 are secure [OII] emmitters found in NED # 17/126 are secure LAEs found in NED # 1/126 ia a secure AGN found in NED # 1/126 is a secure [OIII]5007 emmiter found in NED # 19/126 are unknown in NED # # 107/126 (85%) of our detections were found in the literature # # From the simulation we expect 5 spurious sources in the 12 fields (0.4 per field), so we expect 5/19 unknown sources to be fake # # Classification based on VP spectra and EW: # # 94/126 classified as [OII] emmitters (2.61 arcmin^-2) # 27/126 classified as LAEs (0.74 arcmin^-2) # 1/126 classified as an AGN # 1/126 classified as an [OIII]5007 emmiter # 3/126 unknown # # Quality of the classification # # 15/17 (88%) secure LAEs in the literature were correctly classified # 2/17 (12%) secure LAEs in the literature were wrongly classified as [OII] emmiters (26, 159) # 87/88 (99%) secure [OII] emmiters in the literature were correctly classified # 1/88 (1%) secure [OII] emmiters in the literature could not be classified (61) # 1/1 (100%) secure AGN in the literature was correctly classified # 1/1 (100%) secure [OIII]5007 emmiter was incorrectly classified as an [OII] emmiter # Out of the 19 sources unknown to the literature 12 were classified as LAEs, 4 as [OII], 1 as an [OIII]5007 emmiter, and 2 are UNK # # Conclusions: # # - We never classify a known low-z galaxy as an LAE: 0% contamination # - We miss 12% of known LAEs because we calssify them as low-z galaxies, this is OK, # because they are both low EW LAEs so we really do not miss any high EW LAEs # - We properly classify 104/107 (97%) of all known sources. # - We properly classify 99% of known [OII] emmiters # - We properly classify 100% of known high EW LAEs # - We have a 2/94 (2%) contamination of low EW LAEs in our [OII] sample # - We expect 5/19 unknown sources in the literature to be spurious from the simulations, # since it is a lot more likely that we classify spurious sources as LAEs rather than [OII] emmiters # we expect a 5/27 (19%) contamination from spurious sources in our LAE sample. # #