Doubtless.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Junk. Low EW continuum structure.
Doubtless.
High confidence on classification, medium confidence on association. The slightly best counterpart is 24420, but 24421 would also be low-z by EW.
Doubtless.
Doubtless. 
Doubtless.
The only plausible counterpart has a larger than usual spatial error, but I take it as the most likely. If instead there is no counterpart, this would be an LAE.
Doubtless.
Junk. Funny, but this is a repeat of line entry 7.
High confidence on classification, medium confidence on association.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Cleanly isolated, high confidence LAE.
High confidence. Slightly more than expected spatial error.
Doubtless.
High confidence. More spatial error than expected, again.
Doubtless.
High confidence. More spatial error than expected, again.
Doubtless.
High confidence, but large spatial error.
Low confidence. If the counterpart really is 28448, this is an LAE but if the counterpart is 28447, this is low-z by the EW. It's not entirely clear that the two image numbers are separate objects. 
High confidence on classification, low confidence on association. Either no counterpart or counterpart 23701, which I take at a marginally acceptable distance. 
Doubtless. This is [OII], to be cross-listed with 26 as [NeIII]3869. 
Doubtless. This is [NeIII]3869, to be cross-listed with 25 as [OII]. 
Doubtless.
Doubtless. This appears to be two sources at HST resolution.
Doubtless. This is LyA to be cross-listed with 30 as [CIV]1549. 
Doubtless. This is [CIV]1549 to be cross-listed with 29 as LyA. 
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 35 as [OII], 36 as Hbeta, and 37 as [OIII]4959. 
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 34 as [OIII]5007, 36 as Hbeta, and 37 as [OIII]4959. 
Doubtless. This is Hbeta to be cross-listed with 34 as [OIII]5007, 35 as [OII], and 37 as [OIII]4959. 
Doubtless. This is [OIII]4959 to be cross-listed with 34 as [OIII]5007, 35 as [OII], and 36 as Hbeta. 
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
High confidence. This is a very crowded field, but by process of elimination and spatially proximity both 22451 looks like the counterpart.
High confidence. There's a chance this is instead 28796 or that 28797 is even just a part of 28796, but the SED is reasonable and the better proximity favors 28797 as an LAE.
Very low confidence. There's a second line in entry 55 that doesn't make sense with this line. Only one of them can own the bright continuum object 29111, and that leaves the other without a viable counterpart. Due to proximity, I give the counterpart to the other object and call this a no-counterpart LAE. 
Doubtless.
Medium confidence. This is a larger spatial error than usual.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 48 as Hbeta, 49 as [OIII]4959, and 50 as [OIII]5007. 
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless. This is Hbeta to be cross-listed with 46 as [OII], 49 as [OIII]4959, and 50 as [OIII]5007. 
Doubtless. This is [OIII]4959 to be cross-listed with 46 as [OII], 48 as Hbeta, and 50 as [OIII]5007. 
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 46 as [OII], 48 as Hbeta, and 49 as [OIII]4959. 
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
High confidence on classification. Low confidence on association. #31265 is barely closer, so I use it, but both it and #31269 would be low-z by EW.
High confidence, but large spatial error.
Medium confidence. There are two nearby emission lines that could be the counterpart to 29111 but not both. I take this as the likely counterpart based on proximity and call it low-z.
Low confidence. The closest option is 32109 as an LAE, but 32110 is barely further away and makes more sense withe fiber pattern. I call this low-z.
Doubtless.
Junk. Low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Medium confidence. This is near a bright source which tricks the continuum in the spectra. There is no imaging catalog counterpart, but that may be simply poor deblending. I call this a no counterpart LAE.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 63 as Hbeta, 64 as [OIII]4959, and 65 as [OIII]5007.
Doubtless. This is Hbeta to be cross-listed with 62 as [OII], 64 as [OIII]4959, and 65 as [OIII]5007.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]4959 to be cross-listed with 62 as [OII], 63 as Hbeta, and 65 as [OIII]5007.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 62 as [OII], 63 as Hbeta, and 64 as [OIII]4959.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 68 as Hbeta, 69 as [OIII]4959, 70 as [OIII]5007, and 79 as Hgamma.
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless. This is Hbeta to be cross-listed with 66 as [OII], 69 as [OIII]4959, 70 as [OIII]5007, and 79 as Hgamma.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]4959 to be cross-listed with 66 as [OII], 68 as Hbeta, 70 as [OIII]5007, and 79 as Hgamma.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 66 as [OII], 68 as Hbeta, 69 as [OIII]4959, and 79 as Hgamma.
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 73 as [OIII]4959, 74 as [OIII]5007, 75 as Hbeta, and 83 as Hgamma.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]4959 to be cross-listed with 72 as [OII], 74 as [OIII]5007, 75 as Hbeta, and 83 as Hgamma.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 72 as [OII], 73 as [OIII]4959, 75 as Hbeta, and 83 as Hgamma.
Doubtless. This is Hbeta to be cross-listed with 72 as [OII], 73 as [OIII]4959, 74 as [OIII]5007, and 83 as Hgamma.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 77 as [OIII]5007.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 76 as [OII].
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless. This is Hgamma to be cross-listed with 66 as [OII], 68 as Hbeta, 69 as [OIII]4959, and 70 as [OIII]5007.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
High confidence on classification, low confidence on association. All would be LAE by EW. The closest is 28992, but 28993 and 28994 are also possible. 
Doubtless. This is Hgamma to be cross-listed with 72 as [OII], 73 as [OIII]4959, 74 as [OIII]5007, and 75 as Hbeta.
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless.
Likely junk and simply a cosmic ray.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
High confidence. I manually changed this to low-z because the EW sampling correction just puts the object over 20Ang, but it's brightness renders an LAE impossible. 
Low confidence. Low SN and ratty line profile, but if it's real it has a clear counterpart. 
Doubtless.
Medium confidence. If it's real, the counterpart is obvious.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless. A beautifully isolated LAE.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Medium confidence. The line is oddly shaped across the fiber, but if it's real the counterpart is obvious.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 105 as [OIII]5007.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 104 as [OII].
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
High confidence on classification, low confidence on association. It could be without a counterpart, or it could be 25825 with a large distance error. I take the latter option due to the nicely fitting SED.
High confidence. There are two unassociated lines and only one imaging catalog entry. However, HST shows two overlapping objects. This is clearly low-z.
Doubtless.
Doubtless. See 116.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.
High confidence. The imaging is messy, but anything would be an LAE. I take 26519 as the most likely.
High confidence, but fairly large spatial error.
Junk. Low EW continuum blip and cross-talk from bright star.
Junk. Low EW continuum blip.
Junk. Low EW continuum blip.
High confidence, although it's just barely above the EW cut.
High confidence.
Junk. A cosmic ray mask artifact.
High confidence. I take 19591 as marginally closer, but either it or 19592 would be LAEs by the EW cut.
Medium confidence. The only counterpart is 20365. At HST resolution, there might be two sources and it's then not clear if one could instead be an LAE, but I call it a low-z for now.
Medium confidence. The only counterpart is formally an EW based LAE, but it would be an unusually bright one (in continuum). At HST, this appears to be two sources which wouldn't change the classification. 
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 136 as Hbeta, 139 as Hgamma, 140 as [OIII]5007, and 146 as [OIII]4959.
Doubtless. This is Hbeta to be cross-listed with 135 as [OII], 139 as Hgamma, 140 as [OIII]5007, and 146 as [OIII]4959.
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Junk. A low EW continuum blip.
Doubtless. This is Hgamma to be cross-listed with 135 as [OII], 136 as Hbeta, 140 as [OIII]5007, and 146 as [OIII]4959.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 135 as [OII], 136 as Hbeta, 139 as Hgamma, and 146 as [OIII]4959.
Medium confidence of no counterpart and an LAE. Not sure where the spectral continuum is from.
Doubtless. This is [OII] to be cross-listed with 143 as [OIII]5007.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]5007 to be cross-listed with 142 as [OII].
Doubtless.
High confidence on classification, low on association. Any would be LAEs, but I take 22765 as the closest.
Doubtless. This is [OIII]4959 to be cross-listed with 135 as [OII], 136 as Hbeta, 139 as Hgamma, and 140 as [OIII]5007.
High confidence on classification, low on association. Any would be LAEs, but I take 22630 as the closest.
High confidence.
High confidence.
Medium confidence. Crowded, but most options would be LAEs by EW. I take 30584 as the closest.
High confidence.
High confidence.
Doubtless.
High confidence.
Doubtless. Nice isolated LAE.
Doubtless.
High confidence on classification, medium on association. Both are LAEs by EW cuts. The farther one, 21257, has an extended, possibly spiral morphology which would be odd for an LAE.
Doubtless.
Doubtless.