From Niv's catalog we match to 997944 with a close z. Can't be AGN.
Can't both follow LAE EW rules and be the automatic counterpart, but I knew this from the SED anyway. Tricky. The low-z SED is ill-matching. So is the AGN photo-z and it's chisq. I think there's no counterpart. The low-z 99% includes our value.
Good LAE match. Has low chisq for both SF and AGN.
Good [OII] match. Not an AGN.
Good [OII] match, even though the galaxy z-phot chisq is high.
Good [OII] match.
LAE match. Potential AGN contamination. Both galaxy and AGN chisq are good. z is closer to AGN, but still within galaxy 99%.
This has a horrible galaxy photo-z, but I get a good one. The AGN z matches with a good chisq. Might be AGN contamination.
We're barely outside the galaxy 99% range. The AGN z matches with a medium acceptable chisq.
Good [OII] match.
Good [OII] match.
Nearby but off galaxy and AGN z-phot. Both chisq's are good. 
Good [OII] match.
Good [OII] match.
Hardly any constraint. Might be the LAE we think it is. Might be AGN contamination with a good chisq.
Again hardly any constraint. Might be the LAE we think it is. Might be AGN contamination with a good chisq.
Nothing. Blank like we found.
Good [OII] match.
Could be galaxy for AGN, both with close z-phot and good chisq's.
Close, but outside 99%, to LAE zphot. Might also have AGN contamination.
Good [OII] match.
Good [OII] match.
High-z match. The AGN chisq is only a little worse.
Good [OII] match.
Good [OII] match.
We're somewhat outside the high-z galaxy z range, but not too far. The AGN matches better, but has a slightly worse chisq.
The catalog z implies this should be [OIII]5007, which it might be, but we don't see it.
Good [OII] match.
Good [OII] match.
Good [OII] match.
Good [OIII] match.
Good [OII] match.
Suspicious. The AGN chisq is better, but not by much. This is not a PLG either.
Good [OII] match.
Bad chisq, but it's an [OIII] match.
Good [OII] match.